Search Results

From Breitbart: "Late-night comedians Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert experienced emotional meltdowns Wednesday in their first broadcasts after President-elect Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris in the presidential election."

From Breitbart: "Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) gushed over Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff on Wednesday night applauding him as the very model of modern masculinity at a campaign event for his wife Kamala Harris."

From The Washington Examiner: " In its effort to catch election fraud, the Conservative Political Action Conference this week claimed it had photographic evidence of illegal “ballot harvesting” in Wisconsin."

From Breitbart: "An ex-girlfriend of America’s Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, has come forward to accuse the man who hopes to be history’s first First Gentleman of physically assaulting her in 2012."

From Breitbart: "Vice President Kamala Harris plagiarized material in addition to her book Smart on Crime , an analysis by Washington Free Beacon’s Aaron Sibarium found Tuesday."

From NY Post: "Kamala Harris is a bigot. Forgive the blunt delivery, but there isn’t really any nuance to offer: The Democrats’ presidential nominee has long since stripped it away with her blatant discrimination against people of faith, particularly Catholics."

Throughout this election cycle, one of the strategic tactics that the left have deployed has to do with whether or not republicans (and specifically, Trump) will accept the results of the election. In fact, the liberal media machine has already issued warnings that, should he be defeated, the former president will seize power anyway. Take a look at some of these recent headlines: " The Very Real Scenario Where Trump Loses and Takes Power Anyway " - Politico " How Trump and his Allies are Teeing Up Potential Election Loss Challenges " - Forbes " Trump's Plan to Steal Election is Taking Shape " -The Guardian " Trump Plots to Declare 2024 Rigged " - Rolling Stone It's not difficult to see why they've latched on to this strategy. They want to generate fear amongst voters that if Donald Trump is elected, then he'll act as a dictator, not a president. The only way to prevent this dystopian fate and "save democracy," they tell us, is to elect Kamala Harris. Of course. Here's the question, though: why is no one asking Kamala and her allies whether THEY will accept the results of the election if THEY lose? Are they so noble and honorable that we're all supposed to assume they'll accept defeat in the event of a Trump victory? Why aren't THEY forced to answer whether they'll concede the same way republicans are constantly being forced to answer? It's hard to believe the 2016 election was already eight years ago, but I remember it well. I remember the results coming in, with Trump defying all of the predictions from so-called "experts" and "pollsters." I remember waking up the following morning after Election Day to hear that Donald Trump was elected the 45th president of the United States. And I remember the outcry from the left in the months, and even years, that followed. Just days after Trump secured the presidency, the detestable Washington Times ran a story: " One-Third of Clinton Supporters Say Trump Election is not Legitimate ." In it, they cited a poll that found "a 58 percent majority of Clinton supporters say they accept Trump's election, while 33 percent do not." Additionally, this poll found that "27 percent of Clinton supporters feel 'strongly' he did not win legitimately." Just a couple months later, Rep. John Lewis, a democrat from Georgia, would appear on NBC News with (up)Chuck Todd. "I don't see this President-elect as a legitimate president," Lewis said. "I think the Russians participated in helping this man get elected. And they helped destroy the candidacy of Hillary Clinton." As we all know, the so-called "Russia collusion" that supposedly took place during the 2016 election was found to be verifiably false. Michael Moore was another one, calling Trump an illegitimate president while participating in a protest at Trump Tower following the 2016 election. He argued that Trump "does not have the vote of the people" before heading off to a Shake Shack to wolf down a couple burgers and extra large fry (I made that last part up, but let's be honest... I'm probably not wrong). Hillary Clinton herself, being the bitter malcontent that she is, has not once said that Donald Trump legitimately won the 2016 election. As a matter of fact, she's on record saying the exact opposite, insinuating that Trump somehow stole the election and that she is, in reality, the electoral victor. During an interview on Sunday Morning with Jane Pauley in September, 2017, Hillary Clinton said of Trump: "I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president. He knows. He knows that there were a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did." Need more evidence? Here is a fantastic video that the Republican National Convention put together of Democrats refusing to accept defeat, not just in the 2016 election, but others as well: With all that being said, I'm formally posing the question to those on the left, who up until this point have somehow been given a free pass: will YOU accept the results of the election? Or will you whine, cry, and declare the republican "illegitimate" as you've done so many times before? Sadly, I think we all know the answer to that question.

From Breitbart: The United States needs more migrants to replace the children that Americans are not producing, former President Bill Clinton said at a press event on Sunday. “America is not having enough babies to keep our populations up, so we need immigrants that have been vetted to do work,” Clinton said at a fish fry in Fort Valley, Georgia.

From DailyWire: " Vice President Kamala Harris appears to have plagiarized portions of her 2009 book that she coauthored with Joan O’C Hamilton."

From DailyMail: " Attorneys who worked with Doug Emhoff  at his former firm Venable say he yelled expletives, held a men-only cocktail hour in the office, revoked work perks from women who didn't flirt with him, and took only young, attractive associates in a limousine to a ball."

One of my favorite shows of the past decade and a half is Game of Thrones, an epic fantasy series about kings and armies, dragons and dark magic. At one point in the series, a man by the name of Theon Greyjoy gets captured, tortured and brutalized by Ramsay Bolton, one of the best and most memorable villains I've seen on television in a long time. Over the course of a few seasons, Ramsey slowly but surely broke Theon's character. He humiliated him. He abused him. And perhaps worst of all, he redefined him, to the point where Theon was identifying himself as "Reek," with little to no recollection of who he used to be. Indeed, Ramsey had successfully stripped Theon's identity and replaced it with a new one. When you think about the current political landscape, if the story of Ramsey and Theon seems eerily familiar to you, that's because it's very, very real. In fact, it's happening before our very eyes - the Democrat Party is stripping America of its identity. If you wake up each day feeling like you've somehow slipped into the Twilight Zone, you're not alone. Millions of Americans feel this way (myself included), and for good reason. Nothing seems to make sense anymore. Values that we have held dear for decades have fallen victim to the woke crowd and their never-ending campaign for "social justice," "climate justice" "economic equity," and the likes. Let's take a dive into some of these American values and dissect how the left are perverting them for their own political gain. On wealth creation In his book "Democracy in America," Alexis De Tocqueville pointed out how America's free markets were a core pillar of our country's strength. He noted (and I'm paraphrasing here) that accumulating wealth through business ventures, investment, etc. drove healthy competition, creativity and innovation, which in turn benefited society as a whole. In other words, De Tocqueville saw the value in an economic system that allowed citizens to pursue their own interests and become rich beyond their wildest dreams. It used to be, in America, that we would look to wealthy business owners, inventors and entrepreneurs and say "I want to be like that person. Hopefully one day, through hard work and determination, I too can become successful." Today, success is not celebrated, but rather demeaned and punished. From the left's deranged viewpoint, someone's success is nothing more than a measure of how successfully they ripped off the little guy. Therefore, they resort to old and tired lines like "make the rich pay their fair share," or more recently, in the case of Kamala Harris, "we need to go after companies engaged in price gouging." Some on the left even support implementing caps on income, as if they have some kind of moral or constitutional authority to do so in the first place. As Barack Obama said in 2010 while speaking in Quincy, Illinois, "I do think at a certain point you've made enough money." On religion I'd like to remind our friends on the left of something that will surely make them shutter, but that doesn't make it any less true: America was founded on Christian-Judeo principles. That doesn't mean that we have a national religion; of course, Americans are free to practice their faith however they choose, or not have any faith at all for that matter. But you can't ignore the crucial role that Christian-Judeo prinicples played in the founding of our country. Every single one of our Founding Fathers believed in a divine power. The Declaration of Independence talks about the citizenry being "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights" - that is to say, rights that were given to us by God, not government. Today, even acknowledging these basic truths about our founding is enough to throw the left into a tizzy. Christianity, in particular, is routinely at the center of their attacks, from banning prayer in public spaces to compelling religious institutions to support abortion against their will. As justification, they often point to the "separation of church and state," even though that line appears nowhere in the United States Constitution and was, in fact, part of a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptists reassuring them that the government will not interfere with their religious practices. Here again, America's history - and our identity - is skewed and perverted. On standards Way back in 2003, when I was in third grade, I started my own reading club with my classmates. We read books from R.L. Stine's "Goosebumps" series, and then during free reading time, we would meet in the corner and talk about it. Everyone loved it - that is, until my liberal teacher pulled me aside one day and told me that I had to put an end to the reading club because it was "unfair" to those who weren't yet at that reading level. Not knowing any better at the time, I obeyed my teacher's orders and stopped the club. My dad, on the other hand, raised hell. And looking back, I'm glad he did. This mindset of lowering the bar instead of raising it has spread like a cancer through our society. The woke mob on the left has made it clear that things like "equality" and "diversity" are far more important than merit, and as a result, our institutions are crumbling. And if they're not crumbling yet, they will be sooner rather than later. Case in point: in 2026, the National Conference for Bar Examiners, which administers a standardized BAR exam in most states throughout the U.S., is set to rollout the "NextGen" exam. This new exam will be far less rigorous and will test far fewer areas of the law, with the NCBE's stated goal to "ensure that diversity, fairness and inclusion pervade its test products and services." Similar "lower-the-bar" practices are being implemented in countless institutions across the country, from education, to the police force and firefighters, to airlines and transportation. The result, no doubt, will be catastrophic. Instead of rewarding and promoting the best and brightest to run these institutions, our country will more and more often settle for mediocrity in the name of diversity. On freedom On the global stage, the United States has always had a very special role: to be a beacon of liberty in a world filled with authoritarian regimes. Since our founding, we have prided ourselves on the unalienable rights of our citizens outlined in our Constitution, including but not limited to, the right to speak freely, the right to practice religion, the right to peacefully protest, the right to bear arms, the right to a fair and just legal system, and the right to pursue happiness free from excessive government oversight. Today, liberals are tearing down our country as a beacon of freedom, because they are at war with the Constitution. The freedom of speech constantly falls under attack by leftists claiming to be noble warriors against what they consider to be "misinformation" (except if the mainstream media perpetuates misinformation - in that case, it's perfectly fine). The freedom of religion is under assault, as we previously discussed, and the government's ever-increasing role in virtually every aspect of our lives hinders the individual pursuit of happiness. For these reasons and much more, the bastion of liberty that America once was is in jeopardy. What does it all mean? The progressive left has distorted, and in many cases, flat-out erased, our country's longstanding values; core principles that have historically made America great. And the truly diabolical part of it all is that it's intentional. They know that if they can successfully strip America of it's identity through various insidious tactics - creating mass confusion and turning people against each other by way of the mainstream media, compelling businesses to prioritize DE&I, discouraging innovation and wealth creation through unconstitutional laws and executive fiat, etc. - then they can come in and introduce America to a new identity. An identity that is wholly un-American, with them - the Democrat Party - firmly in control. This is why we must elect Donald Trump in November and put an end to this madness. We must resist this attempt by Kamala Harris and her allies on the left to redefine us and rebrand us. If we don't, our identity - our true identity - will be lost forever.

Click here to purchase. The United States of America has long been the lone beacon of freedom and sensibility in a chaotic world. Now, she is under threat from a lethal ideology that seeks to humiliate and erase anyone who does not bow at its altar. The threat in question? Wokeism. In Right Wing Revolution: How to Beat the Woke and Save the West, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk drags wokeism out of the shadows and details the exact steps needed to stop its toxic spread. Right Wing Revolution is not a cautionary tale. Wokeism has already seeped into every aspect of American society. Instead, Charlie Kirk looks to inform and prepare every reader for the coming confrontation against one of the most existential threats the United States has ever faced.